Jason Bateman is a versatile actor, but Carry-On puts a lot of weight on his shoulders as key bad guy of Carry-On. Like in any action thriller, the bad guy is just as important as the main protagonist, here played by Taron Egerton. But, sadly for both of them and the audience, the film never manages to find the right formula between their interactions and the subsequent anticipation, where this tale of Novichok ends up - ironically - very lacking in the department of on-screen chemistry.
Instead of something that will be the new version of Die Hard 2, the film sends us into the grotto of the Transportation Security Administration or TSA in a huge Los Angeles airport. Here, Ethan, played by Egerton, has a day from the depths of hell when the mysterious Traveler pulls him into a web of lies, deceit, and mortal danger. In the heart of it all is a case with the Novichok agents that the Traveler needs to put on a plane at LAX, no matter the cost. Ethan, on the other hand, has to stop him and still keep his life and the life of his pregnant girlfriend, or trade these for countless victims of the deadly compound.
The entire Carry-On could have been somewhat improved by shortening all of its phases, as well as taking out the completely redundant sequence in the luggage facility. It feels incredibly laden with CGI and ultimately serves no purpose other than to try and chase (pun intended) some relatively novel action thrills. However, the sequence, like the entire film, needed a bit of afterthought from the director Jaume Collet-Serra, as well as some cutting down of runtime. This wouldn’t have turned Carry-On into a masterpiece of action cinema - that ultimately lies in the lacking dynamic between Bateman and Egerton - but would have made it a bit more compact and appealing.
